An independent organization advocating for free expression, viewpoint diversity, and academic freedom at Cornell University

Read this Overview of the threat to academic freedom now facing Cornell.

CFSA Policy Recommendations To Cornell University : "At A Glance" Summary

                                                                                      At A Glance:

                                            CFSA Open Inquiry Policy Recommendations to Cornell University

 

Article 1: University Policy

  • Adopt the Chicago Statement in its entirety.
  • Adopt the Kalven Committee Report, including a commitment that the University will refrain from participating in political activism and that viewpoint diversity will be facilitated through hiring practices, research support, and training.
  • Affirm that words are not violence and violence is not speech.
  • Reject the heckler’s veto. The University should not charge security fees to a student or organization based on the content of their expression or anticipated reaction to a guest. Administration should ensure that protests in response to speakers do not interfere with the ability of speakers to be heard and listeners to hear. 
  • Create and maintain an administrative structure that operates as a check on University policies or practices that infringe on speech or ideological diversity.
  • Foster diversity of thought by encouraging admission or hiring from a wide array of economic, geographical, viewpoint, and cultural backgrounds.

 

Article 2: Students

  • Mandate training on the importance of free speech and academic freedom on campus. Training should include instruction on how to engage in civil debate and constructive disagreement.
  • Students should not be compelled to express opinions that they don’t hold.
  • Promote viewpoint diversity in the student body by casting a wide net for potential applicants and encouraging applications from a variety of backgrounds.
  • The University should forcefully protect students’ free speech rights inside and outside the classroom.
  • Any limitations on student speech should comport with reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions consistent with federal and state law.
  • Any student accused of any infraction should have due process. The accused student shall be provided confrontation of the accuser, cross-examination, presentation of witnesses or other evidence, and the presumption of innocence.
  • Students should not be encouraged or supported in spying and reporting on each other.
  • Student organizations should be able to choose their own leadership and tenets without interference from the University. 
  • DEI course requirements should be eliminated for all courses of study that don’t directly implicate it. 

 

Article 3: Faculty

  • Faculty should be evaluated based on their individual contribution to their own academic field and the Cornell community without reference to facility in the lexicon of critical studies.
  • Faculty should not be compelled to express as their own opinions those they do not hold.
  • Faculty speech and personal/academic writings, investigations, and research should be protected in public and private settings.
  • Any faculty or staff accused of any infraction should have due process.

The accused faculty or staff shall be provided confrontation of the accuser, cross-examination, presentation of witnesses or other evidence, and the presumption of innocence.

 

                                                                                                                                 -- END ---