As the Cornell Board of Trustees elections approach in February 2025, concerns have arisen regarding the fairness of the election process, particularly towards non-slated candidates. Recent articles from National Review and The College Fix have highlighted potential biases embedded within Cornell's strict election rules that may disadvantage these candidates.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99091/9909160fd38a77d0629f9f94095570cce50d1c9a" alt=""
The National Review article, published on January 19, 2025, delves into the structural challenges faced by independent candidates in the upcoming trustee elections. It emphasizes the university administration's influence over the election process, suggesting that the current system favors candidates aligned with administrative perspectives, thereby marginalizing those advocating for free speech and open inquiry.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee278/ee2783e5a0c0d5071e3da70ea6b78faf91d6f590" alt=""
Similarly, The College Fix article from January 20, 2025, examines the specific election regulations that hinder independent candidates. The piece points out that the nomination procedures, campaigning restrictions, and limited access to alumni networks create significant obstacles for candidates not endorsed by the university. This systemic bias, as reported, undermines the democratic nature of the trustee elections and stifles diverse viewpoints within the board.
The Cornell Free Speech Alliance (CFSA) is deeply concerned about these reports. A fair and transparent election process is essential to ensure that the Board of Trustees represents a wide range of perspectives, especially those committed to upholding free speech and academic freedom. The apparent biases not only compromise the integrity of the elections but also threaten the foundational principles of open inquiry that Cornell University stands for. If we as alumni cannot freely discuss candidates running for Alumni-elected Trustee with our friends, without the candidates then being removed from the ballot, is our right to free speech being infringed upon?
We urge the university administration to address these concerns promptly by reviewing and amending the election procedures to promote fairness and inclusivity in future election cycles. Ensuring that all candidates can get out their message is crucial for fostering a vibrant academic community and informed electorate.
As alumni, students, faculty, and supporters of free speech, it is imperative that we stay informed and engaged during this election period. We encourage everyone to read the aforementioned articles, share them within your networks, and participate actively in the upcoming elections. Your vote in February 2025 will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of Cornell University and preserving the values of free expression and open inquiry.
Together, we can advocate for a more transparent and equitable election process that truly reflects the diverse voices of the Cornell community.